Serveur d'exploration sur la musique en Sarre

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment

Identifieur interne : 000579 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000578; suivant : 000580

Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment

Auteurs : Lia Plakans [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:190BFD281CFEC08AC0EBAE4185A3D6BD6CD00A95

English descriptors

Abstract

As integrated tasks become more common in assessing writing for academic purposes, it is necessary to investigate how test takers approach these tasks. The present study explores the processes of test takers undertaking reading-to-write tasks developed for a university English placement exam. Think-aloud protocols and interviews of university-level non-native writers of English were collected to capture the writers’ composing processes. These data were analysed to determine if the tasks elicited an academic writing process of discourse synthesis and to identify what language issues were present. The results revealed some writers use discourse synthesis subprocesses in composing responses to the reading-to-write tasks, with apparent d ifferences across writers. Language difficulties that emerged for writers were vocabulary knowledge and use, as well as stylistic concerns. The implications of the study suggest that reading-to-write tasks may elicit a discourse synthesis process that could be used for validity evidence in some contexts and lead to more appropriate placement into academic writing courses.

Url:
DOI: 10.1177/0265532209340192


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Plakans, Lia" sort="Plakans, Lia" uniqKey="Plakans L" first="Lia" last="Plakans">Lia Plakans</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:190BFD281CFEC08AC0EBAE4185A3D6BD6CD00A95</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/0265532209340192</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/190BFD281CFEC08AC0EBAE4185A3D6BD6CD00A95/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000246</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000246</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000234</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000416</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000416</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0265-5322:2009:Plakans L:discourse:synthesis:in</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000579</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000579</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000579</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Plakans, Lia" sort="Plakans, Lia" uniqKey="Plakans L" first="Lia" last="Plakans">Lia Plakans</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<orgName type="university">Université de l'Iowa</orgName>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Iowa City</settlement>
<region type="state">Iowa</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Language Testing</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0265-5322</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1477-0946</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher>
<pubPlace>Sage UK: London, England</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2009-10">2009-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="561">561</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="587">587</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0265-5322</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">190BFD281CFEC08AC0EBAE4185A3D6BD6CD00A95</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1177/0265532209340192</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">10.1177_0265532209340192</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0265-5322</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Academic coursework</term>
<term>Academic purposes</term>
<term>Academic tasks</term>
<term>Action writer segments</term>
<term>Baby pictures</term>
<term>Background knowledge</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Cohen</term>
<term>College composition</term>
<term>Concurrent protocols</term>
<term>Content organization grammar</term>
<term>Contrastive rhetoric</term>
<term>Cultural borrowing</term>
<term>Cumming</term>
<term>Data collection</term>
<term>Digital camera</term>
<term>Discourse</term>
<term>Discourse features</term>
<term>Discourse synthesis</term>
<term>Discourse synthesis framework</term>
<term>Discourse synthesis process</term>
<term>Discourse synthesis subprocesses</term>
<term>Discourse synthesis transformations</term>
<term>Eduardo</term>
<term>English placement exam</term>
<term>Exam</term>
<term>Exploratory study</term>
<term>First language</term>
<term>Foreign influences</term>
<term>Foreign language</term>
<term>Globalization</term>
<term>Good thing</term>
<term>Good topic</term>
<term>Idea units</term>
<term>Language difficulties</term>
<term>Language issues</term>
<term>Language testing</term>
<term>Language testing research</term>
<term>Less discourse synthesis</term>
<term>Megumi</term>
<term>Michigan press</term>
<term>More detail</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other participants</term>
<term>Other subprocesses</term>
<term>Other writers</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Placement exam</term>
<term>Plakans</term>
<term>Plakans table</term>
<term>Poor countries</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Previous research</term>
<term>Proficiency</term>
<term>Protocol</term>
<term>Protocol analysis</term>
<term>Reading research</term>
<term>Reading source text</term>
<term>Reflective essay</term>
<term>Relevant information</term>
<term>Research methodology</term>
<term>Sangmin</term>
<term>Second language</term>
<term>Second language proficiency</term>
<term>Source text</term>
<term>Source texts</term>
<term>Specific purposes</term>
<term>Spivey</term>
<term>Stylistic concerns</term>
<term>Subprocess</term>
<term>Subprocesses</term>
<term>Synthesis</term>
<term>Taker</term>
<term>Target language</term>
<term>Task instructions</term>
<term>Technology technology</term>
<term>Test developers</term>
<term>Test takers</term>
<term>Test tasks</term>
<term>Toefl</term>
<term>Toefl scores</term>
<term>Topic</term>
<term>Topic sentence</term>
<term>Total number</term>
<term>University level</term>
<term>Validity evidence</term>
<term>Vocabulary knowledge</term>
<term>Vocabulary punctuation</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">As integrated tasks become more common in assessing writing for academic purposes, it is necessary to investigate how test takers approach these tasks. The present study explores the processes of test takers undertaking reading-to-write tasks developed for a university English placement exam. Think-aloud protocols and interviews of university-level non-native writers of English were collected to capture the writers’ composing processes. These data were analysed to determine if the tasks elicited an academic writing process of discourse synthesis and to identify what language issues were present. The results revealed some writers use discourse synthesis subprocesses in composing responses to the reading-to-write tasks, with apparent d ifferences across writers. Language difficulties that emerged for writers were vocabulary knowledge and use, as well as stylistic concerns. The implications of the study suggest that reading-to-write tasks may elicit a discourse synthesis process that could be used for validity evidence in some contexts and lead to more appropriate placement into academic writing courses.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Iowa</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Iowa City</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de l'Iowa</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Iowa">
<name sortKey="Plakans, Lia" sort="Plakans, Lia" uniqKey="Plakans L" first="Lia" last="Plakans">Lia Plakans</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Plakans, Lia" sort="Plakans, Lia" uniqKey="Plakans L" first="Lia" last="Plakans">Lia Plakans</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000579 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000579 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sarre
   |area=    MusicSarreV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:190BFD281CFEC08AC0EBAE4185A3D6BD6CD00A95
   |texte=   Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Sun Jul 15 18:16:09 2018. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 19:21:25 2024